Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Michigan's Marijuana Tax Challenge: A Legal Insight

Michigan has become a focal point in the ongoing battle over cannabis taxation, with a contentious new 24% wholesale marijuana tax igniting legal challenges. As proceedings commence in court, the case has captured national attention due to its potential influence on cannabis pricing and the broader implications it holds for voter-endorsed legislation and tax policies nationwide.

Whether you reside in Michigan or are situated miles away, this legal battle is significant. The case could set precedents that affect how other states structure, amend, and defend their cannabis taxation laws, potentially signalling future disputes as the industry continues its expansion.

Let’s delve into the essential aspects Americans should be aware of.

The Proposed Taxation Model in Michigan

Embedded within Michigan's fiscal budget for 2025–2026 is a new 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at generating revenue for crucial road enhancements. This tax targets the economic activities earlier in the supply chain, impacting pricing before products are retailed.

Currently, Michigan enforces two primary taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis sales, endorsed by voters in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax

Should the wholesale tax be implemented, it would escalate Michigan's cannabis tax complexity, ranking among the nation's most layered tax frameworks. Image 2

Industry’s Legal Rebuttal

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends the tax is unconstitutional, asserting that the voter-backed 2018 marijuana law demands a supermajority vote for amendments. With the wholesale tax passed by a mere simple majority, the industry argues legislative overreach.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol highlighted the significance of this issue: “As the foremost cannabis trade organization, we’re committed to defending the intentions of Michigan’s electorate.” (Source: Michigan Advance) The tax is anticipated to increase consumer costs, challenge small businesses, and potentially shift consumers towards the unregulated market—a trend observable in high-tax jurisdictions like California.

State’s Position on the Tax

The Michigan government argues in defense of the tax, stating:

  • The wholesale tax is a new initiative, separate from the 2018 cannabis legislation

  • The legislature maintains the authority to institute taxes for fiscal policy

  • The primary goal is to fund infrastructure development, not amend cannabis regulation

Should the court uphold this stance, the tax could be implemented by January 1, 2026.

Implications for Consumers Nationwide

Even those distant from Michigan should observe closely, as cannabis tax structures often set precedents beyond state lines. If the tax withstands legal scrutiny:

  • Wholesale prices could escalate

  • Retail prices might increase correspondingly

  • There's a risk of driving consumers to cheaper, unregulated markets

  • Pressure on smaller operators could lead to market consolidation

If overturned, Michigan would maintain its position as a relatively lower-cost legal cannabis market. Image 1

National Relevance of Michigan's Legal Debate

This lawsuit, though centered in Michigan, resonates nationally due to its implications on:

1. Powers of Voter-Approved Statutes

If legislative bodies can enact taxes without supermajority endorsement, this could redefine the dynamics of ballot initiatives across states.

2. Potential Restructuring of Cannabis Taxation

States with infrastructure deficits might consider adopting Michigan's approach contingent on its legal outcome.

3. Highlighting Disparities in Cannabis Taxation

Variations in state cannabis taxes can stifle competitive legal markets or foster unregulated market growth, as seen in states like Oregon and California.

Michigan's case offers a framework on which similar tax challenges in other states might be built.

Future Developments

The Michigan Court of Claims has reviewed the arguments and a decision is anticipated shortly. The outcome may eventually require resolution by the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the verdict, its ramifications will extend beyond Michigan, influencing national discourse on the governance of voter-endorsed laws, evolving industries, and tax regulation.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
Thompson-Smith CPA We'd love to chat!
Please feel free to use our Ai powered chat assistant or contact us using the buttons below.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully